separate casts for each element of the (f). Admittedly, he made his observations using a microfilm copy of the Bible, and so his opinion is not to be taken as conclusive.
20. Gamini Salgado,
The Elizabethan Underworld
(New York: St. Martinâs Press, 1992), p. 78.
21. Thomas Ross,
Natural and Artificial Conclusions
(1567), in ibid., p. 75.
22. Michael Clapham, â
Printing
,â A History of Technology , vol. III, ed. Charles Singer et al. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957), p. 395.
23. The Holie Bible [microform] (London: Richard Jugge ⦠[1568] ), pagination unreadable. The first footnote is on the first page of the book of Job; fent, fanctified , and faide , in the original, have been changed to sent, sanctified , and saide .
24. See Gamini Salgado,
The Elizabethan Underworld
(New York: St. Martinâs Press, 1992), p. 26, for details.
25. The Holie Bible [microform] (London: Richard Jugge ⦠[1568]), pagination unreadable. The first footnote is in the first page of the book of Job. (Minor changes in spelling have been made.)
26. Colin Clair,
A History of Printing in Britain
(London: Cassell, 1965), pp. 71-2.
27. Ibid, pp. 71-2.
28. William Martyn,
The Historie and Lives of the Kings of England: From William the Conqueror, unto the end of the Raigne of King Henry the Eighth
(London: James Boler, 1628), unpaginated. F âs have been changed to Sâs when appropriate; account is accompt in the original.
29. Ibid., Epistle Dedicaâtorie [sic] , unpaginated.
30. William Martyn,
The Historie and Lives of the Kings of England: From William the Conqueror, unto the end of the Raigne of King Henry the Eighth
(London: James Boler, 1628), p. 191.
31. Ibid.
32. Ibid.
33. Roger Widdrington,
A Theologicall Disputation Concerning the Oath of Allegiance
, dedicated to the most Holy Father Pope Paul the fifth, Wherein All The Principall arguments which have hitherto beene brought by Cardinall Bellarmine, Leonard Leffius, Martin Becanus, and divers others, against the new Oath of Allegiance, lately established in England by Act of Parliament, are sincerely , perspicuously, and exactly examined (London[?]: E. Allde[?], 1613), unpaginated.
34. Ibid., p. 45.
35. John Rainolds, The OVERTHROW OF STAGEPLAYES By the way of controversie betwixt D. Gager and D. Rainoldes [sic], wherein all the reasons that can be made for them are notably refuted; the observations answered, and the case fo[r] cleared and resolved, at what the judgement of any man, that is not forward and perverse, may easilie bee satisfied. WHEREIN IS MANIFESTLY proved that it is not onely unlawfull to be an Actor but a beholder of those vanities (Oxford: John Lichfield, 1629), p. 25. F âs are changed to Sâs, U âs to V âs.
36. Ibid., p. 52. The note is a long, nervous explanation of why Rainolds had the audacity to insert a word in one of his citings of Gagerâs letter. â⦠I take the omitting thereof ⦠to be a slippe of your penne, and therefore doe insert it.â At just this point the margin gives out; the note curls into something that resembles a respectful bow. ( F âs changed to Sâs.)
Chapter 3
1. Janet Todd, ed.,
The Works of Aphra Behn
, vol. 1 (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1992), p. 443.
2. Abraham Cowley,
Poems: Miscellanies, The Mistress, Pindarique Odes, Davideis. Verses Written on Several Occasions
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1905), p. 251.
3. Ibid., p. 66.
4. Ibid., p. 242.
5. Ibid., p. 66.
6. Ibid., p. 246.
7. Ibid., p. 247.
8. Ibid., p. 270.
9. Janet Todd, ed.,
The Works of Aphra Behn
(Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1992), p. ix.
10. Ibid., p. xvii.
11. Ibid., p. 72.
12. Ibid.
13. Janet Todd, ed.,
The Works of Aphra Behn
(Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1992), p. 72.
14. Ibid.
15. Ibid., p. 73.
16. Rosemary Cowler,
The Prose Works of Alexander Pope
(Hamden, Conn.: Archon, 1986), p. 219.
17. See George Woodcock,
The English
Anna Sheehan
Nonnie Frasier
Lolah Runda
Meredith Skye
Maureen Lindley
Charlaine Harris
Alexandra V
Bobbi Marolt
Joanna A. Haze
Ellis Peters