Reign of Mary , pp. 124-6.
8. Cal. Span ., XII, p. 216. Loach, Parliament and the Crown , pp. 97-9.
9. Ibid., p. 98.
10. Cal. Span ., XII, p. 251.
11. Renard to the Emperor, 13 May 1554 Cal. Span ., XII, pp. 250-4.
12. Thomas F. Mayer, Reginald Pole, Prince and Prophet (2000), pp. 60-1.
13. TNA SP11 /4, no. 10.
14. Cal. Span ., XII, pp. 297-9.
15. Ambassadors to the Emperor, 22–25 May 1554. Cal. Span ., XII, p. 258.
16. ‘The officers appointed for his Highness’s service have been living at Southampton at great expense for a long time, and are now beginning to leave that place, speaking strangely of his Highness.’ Renard to the Emperor, 9 July 1554. Cal. Span ., XII, p. 309.
17. Loades, Mary Tudor , p. 223.
18. ‘John Elder’s Letter, describing the arrival and marriage of King Philip …’, Chronicle of Queen Jane , Appendix X, pp. 139-40.
19. Ibid., p. 140.
20. Ruy Gomez (Philip’s secretary) to Francisco de Eraso, 27 July 1554, commenting on Mary’s appearance and demeanour during the wedding service. He also added that she had kept her eyes fixed on the sacrament throughout, and was ‘a perfect saint’. Cal. Span ., XIII, p. 2.
21. In Spanish, ‘ Que yo no quiero amores, / en Ingalterra, / pues otros mejores / tengo yo in mi tierra …’, Fernando Diaz-Plaja (ed.), La Historia de Espana en sus Documentos (1958), p. 149.
22. The Chronicle of Queen Jane , Appendix XI. ‘The Marriage of Queen Mary and King Philip’ (the official heralds’ account).
23. Ibid.
24. The Chronicle of Queen Jane , p. 170. Edward Underhill’s account.
25. Tres Cartas de to sucedido en el viaje de su Alteza in Inglaterra (1877), Primera Carta, p. 111.
26. Ibid.
27. Tres Cartas , Tercera Carta, p. 102.
28. Cal. Span ., XIII, p. 11.
29. Loades, Mary Tudor , p. 177.
8 A Woman’s Problems
1. Judith M. Richards, ‘Mary Tudor as “Sole Quene”? Gendering Tudor Monarchy’, Historical Journal , 40 (1997) pp. 895-924.
2. Cal. Span ., XIII, p. 11.
3. Glyn Redworth, “‘Matters impertinent to women”; male and female monarchy under Philip and Mary’, English Historical Review , 112 (1997), pp. 597-613.
4. S. Anglo, Spectacle, Pageantry and Early Tudor Policy (1969), pp. 56-98. The pageants offered on that occasion had been a tour de force of humanist imagination.
5. ‘John Elder’s Letter’, Chronicle of Queen Jane , p. 146. See also Anglo, Spectacle , pp. 327-38.
6. ‘The ambassador,’ he wrote, ‘gets everything in a muddle. However, I do not blame him, but rather the person who sent a man of his small attainments to conduct so capital an affair as this match, instead of entrusting it to a Spaniard.’ Renard was a Franc-Comptois, and the dig is at Antoine de Perrenot, Bishop of Arras. 23 August 1554. Cal. Span ., XIII, p. 35.
7. Ibid., p. 33.
8. Machyn, Diary , pp. 69, 72.
9. Archivo General de Simancas, CMC la E, legajo 1184.
10. Redworth, ‘“Matters impertinent’’’. Mary had instructed the select council that they were to ‘tell the king the whole state of the realm’, but they seem to have used their judgement in interpreting that.
11. For a discussion of Philip’s impact on the court during 1554–5, see D. Loades, Intrigue and Treason: The Tudor Court 1547–58 (2004), pp. 178-213.
12. Cal. Span ., XIII, p. 28.
13. William Forrest, A Newe Ballad of the Marigolde (1554).
14. Cal. Ven ., VI, p. 10. A memorandum on developments concerning Church property.
15. Cal. Span ., XIII, pp. 63-4. Loades, Mary Tudor , p. 236. For a full discussion of this negotiation, see Rodriguez Salgado, The Changing Face of Empire , p. 97.
16. Cal. Span ., XIII, pp. 92-5.
17. House of Lords Records Office, Original Act, 1 & 2 Philip and Mary, c.18. Loach, Parliament and the Crown , p. 106.
18. The text of Pole’s address is preserved in Biblioteca Vaticana, Rome, MS Vat. Lat. 5968, which is available on microfilm. A translation was printed by J. Collier, An Ecclesiastical History of Great
8. Cal. Span ., XII, p. 216. Loach, Parliament and the Crown , pp. 97-9.
9. Ibid., p. 98.
10. Cal. Span ., XII, p. 251.
11. Renard to the Emperor, 13 May 1554 Cal. Span ., XII, pp. 250-4.
12. Thomas F. Mayer, Reginald Pole, Prince and Prophet (2000), pp. 60-1.
13. TNA SP11 /4, no. 10.
14. Cal. Span ., XII, pp. 297-9.
15. Ambassadors to the Emperor, 22–25 May 1554. Cal. Span ., XII, p. 258.
16. ‘The officers appointed for his Highness’s service have been living at Southampton at great expense for a long time, and are now beginning to leave that place, speaking strangely of his Highness.’ Renard to the Emperor, 9 July 1554. Cal. Span ., XII, p. 309.
17. Loades, Mary Tudor , p. 223.
18. ‘John Elder’s Letter, describing the arrival and marriage of King Philip …’, Chronicle of Queen Jane , Appendix X, pp. 139-40.
19. Ibid., p. 140.
20. Ruy Gomez (Philip’s secretary) to Francisco de Eraso, 27 July 1554, commenting on Mary’s appearance and demeanour during the wedding service. He also added that she had kept her eyes fixed on the sacrament throughout, and was ‘a perfect saint’. Cal. Span ., XIII, p. 2.
21. In Spanish, ‘ Que yo no quiero amores, / en Ingalterra, / pues otros mejores / tengo yo in mi tierra …’, Fernando Diaz-Plaja (ed.), La Historia de Espana en sus Documentos (1958), p. 149.
22. The Chronicle of Queen Jane , Appendix XI. ‘The Marriage of Queen Mary and King Philip’ (the official heralds’ account).
23. Ibid.
24. The Chronicle of Queen Jane , p. 170. Edward Underhill’s account.
25. Tres Cartas de to sucedido en el viaje de su Alteza in Inglaterra (1877), Primera Carta, p. 111.
26. Ibid.
27. Tres Cartas , Tercera Carta, p. 102.
28. Cal. Span ., XIII, p. 11.
29. Loades, Mary Tudor , p. 177.
8 A Woman’s Problems
1. Judith M. Richards, ‘Mary Tudor as “Sole Quene”? Gendering Tudor Monarchy’, Historical Journal , 40 (1997) pp. 895-924.
2. Cal. Span ., XIII, p. 11.
3. Glyn Redworth, “‘Matters impertinent to women”; male and female monarchy under Philip and Mary’, English Historical Review , 112 (1997), pp. 597-613.
4. S. Anglo, Spectacle, Pageantry and Early Tudor Policy (1969), pp. 56-98. The pageants offered on that occasion had been a tour de force of humanist imagination.
5. ‘John Elder’s Letter’, Chronicle of Queen Jane , p. 146. See also Anglo, Spectacle , pp. 327-38.
6. ‘The ambassador,’ he wrote, ‘gets everything in a muddle. However, I do not blame him, but rather the person who sent a man of his small attainments to conduct so capital an affair as this match, instead of entrusting it to a Spaniard.’ Renard was a Franc-Comptois, and the dig is at Antoine de Perrenot, Bishop of Arras. 23 August 1554. Cal. Span ., XIII, p. 35.
7. Ibid., p. 33.
8. Machyn, Diary , pp. 69, 72.
9. Archivo General de Simancas, CMC la E, legajo 1184.
10. Redworth, ‘“Matters impertinent’’’. Mary had instructed the select council that they were to ‘tell the king the whole state of the realm’, but they seem to have used their judgement in interpreting that.
11. For a discussion of Philip’s impact on the court during 1554–5, see D. Loades, Intrigue and Treason: The Tudor Court 1547–58 (2004), pp. 178-213.
12. Cal. Span ., XIII, p. 28.
13. William Forrest, A Newe Ballad of the Marigolde (1554).
14. Cal. Ven ., VI, p. 10. A memorandum on developments concerning Church property.
15. Cal. Span ., XIII, pp. 63-4. Loades, Mary Tudor , p. 236. For a full discussion of this negotiation, see Rodriguez Salgado, The Changing Face of Empire , p. 97.
16. Cal. Span ., XIII, pp. 92-5.
17. House of Lords Records Office, Original Act, 1 & 2 Philip and Mary, c.18. Loach, Parliament and the Crown , p. 106.
18. The text of Pole’s address is preserved in Biblioteca Vaticana, Rome, MS Vat. Lat. 5968, which is available on microfilm. A translation was printed by J. Collier, An Ecclesiastical History of Great
Similar Books
