too soon for the verdict to have been read. On the other hand, he doubted that the jury would be out for much longer, as the case was all but open and shut, which explained why he was there to begin with, along with seven other members of President Zumaâs Blackwater security detail.
David Joubert, the man currently on trial, had been Zumaâs close friend, business associate, and right-hand man when he was deputy president of South Africa under the previous administration, headed by Thabo Mbeki. Though they were fellow Xhosa tribesmen whose relationship went back to Zumaâs childhood, Zuma had disassociated himself from Joubert shortly after the National Prosecuting Authority, South Africaâs leading judicial body, had charged Zuma with two counts of corruption in 2005, adding fraud, racketeering, and money laundering a couple of years laterâallegations that had clung to him even after he won the presidency four years later, ousting Mbeki from the post heâd held since Nelson Mandela left office.
In the eyes of many, including Whysall himself, Joubert was a sacrificial lamb. The intractable poverty and joblessness that beleaguered South Africaâand the entire continentâoften led to the fortunes of African politicians turning on a dime. Before his parliamentary election Zuma had been a populist icon, the man whoâd gained the backing of organized labor and vowed to bring new business and employment to the nation. But Whysall had been in enough of the worldâs poorer countries to know that hope and desperation blinded people to the stains on their chosen saviorâs robes.
The charges against Zuma stemmed from his association with Schabir Shaik, a Durban businessman who had been convicted of bribing senior officers in the South African Navy in order to win several lucrative contracts, including the construction of four Valour-class frigates valued in excess of one and a half billion rand, or a hundred fifty million euros, apiece. Additional charges linked Shaikâand, by extension, Zumaâto a French arms company. In that instance, the NPA claimed that Shaik had accepted bribes for military contracts on behalf of Zuma, who was alleged to have unwisely proceeded to launder the money through some of South Africaâs largest banks. Ultimately, Schabir Shaik was sentenced to fifteen years in prison, and shortly thereafter, the National Prosecuting Authority had started to collect the evidence it would need to formally indict Jacob Zuma.
That had been four years earlier, and the problem lay in what had occurred since. Despite having been accused and barely acquitted of rape before his election, Zuma had found a solid base of support in South Africaâs far left, which had grown disillusioned with Mbekiâs habit of ignoring views that conflicted with his own, as well as his steadfast refusal to address the needs of the nationâs vast lower-class community. Zumaâs popularity was so great that the ANC had voted him in as its new party head in 2007, effectively putting an end to Thabo Mbekiâs grasp on the presidency. The only problem had been the assortment of charges levied against Zuma, and they were dismissed on grounds of prosecutorial misconduct, finally clearing his path to power.
Whysall could not have said whether the dismissal had come on a legitimate, if convenient, technicality or quiet disclosures that Mbeki had been pressuring the NPA to disgrace and imprison his chief competitor. Both were rumored, but he was not inclined to plunge into the quagmire of African politics for the truth. He knew, and wanted to know, only as much as was necessary to do his job.
What he knew now was that the same constituency that boosted Zuma to the top had grown disillusioned less than a year into his first term of office. Winter in South Africa lasted from May through September, and the last had been marked with especially cruel, frigid weather. With millions
Meagan Spooner
Dianna Love
April Andrews
Eric Pollarine
Suzanne Weyn
James Lovegrove
Margaret L. Carter
Renee Pawlish
David Pratt
Carl Hiaasen