National Occupation. âWhy are you studying English?â Aaron had asked each student earlier, and Leonardo had explained that it was his first step toward becoming a pilot in China.
âChina?â Aaron said. He had not meant to sound so surprised. âWhy China?â
âIs big country,â Leonardo said.
âYes,â Aaron agreed, waiting for the explanation to continue, but Leonardo, he would learn, did not believe in explaining a point to death. He considered others capable of connecting the dots: a big country required lots of planes, planes required pilots. Leonardoâs reticence would not benefit his English, but Aaron could not help but think that circumspection was attractive in a pilot. Aaron did not like flying, particularly the life-and-death bargaining he did with himself each time he got on a plane. When he imagined the people who sat in the cockpit, he did not want to think of them as chatty sorts who cared about entertaining one another. He wanted to think of them like Leonardo, less enamored of words than flight.
âYou have a question, Leonardo?â Aaron asked.
âYesterday,â Leonardo said, âI hear my coworker say to my other coworker, âI hope the boss wasnât mad.âââ Leonardo leaned forward. âIs correct?â
âYes,â Aaron said apologetically, for he could see the point in question. âIt depends on the situation, but yes, it is correct.â
âWhy?â Leonardo demanded, almost angrily. âWhy he is saying âhopeâ when it is past tense? Hope is about the future. This is what we always learn.â
The other students nodded, asserting their collective will. Aaron could feel their frustration and beneath it their distrust, for they had been taught, rightfully, that hope described the future, yet here he stood, telling them that this was not always so. In just one hour, he had taken away more knowledge than he had supplied.
Aaron had discovered his love of grammar as a boy, when he first observed in these structures and symbols a kind of order, patterns that allowed wordsâhis first loveâto join together and make sense. He saw that he could open his heart and love grammar almost more, the way one loved the uglier child best because it required more effort to do so. He was known for explaining grammar in ways that made sense, for filling the board with sketches and equations and even cartoons that his students eagerly copied into their notebooks. He turned now and wrote: I hope he wasnât mad. Below the sentence, he drew atimeline, the past on the left marked Know, the future on the right, Donât Know .
âHere we are, between the pastââhe pointed to the word Know ââand the future, which we donât know.â He looked at them encouragingly. âOkay, now letâs say one of the drivers mixes up a very big pizza order, and the next day everyone is wondering whether the boss was mad when he found out, but nobody actually knows whether he was mad because he came in after everyone was already gone. How would you say that?â
âI wish that he werenât mad,â suggested Katya, the lone Russian.
âOkay,â Aaron said. âExcept that means he was mad, that I know he was mad.â A few of the students nodded. âIn this case, the bossâs reaction is in the past, but we donât know it yet. Weâll learn about it in the future, so we have to say, âI hope he wasnât mad.âââ
He looked at them, they looked back, and then several more nodded. He was relieved to be back in the classroom, where he felt clear about what was needed from him: his knowledge and his steadying presence. But teaching provided something he needed also, a period each day when his own life receded.
âIf there are no more questions,â he said, âletâs take a break.â He pointed one last time at the diagram
Rachel Cantor
Halldór Laxness
Tami Hoag
Andrew Hallam
Sarah Gilman
Greg Kincaid
Robert Fagles Virgil, Bernard Knox
Margaret Grace
Julie Kenner
James Bibby