however, is at bottom no more than a testimony about the man of a very limited period. Lack of a historical sense is the original error of all philosophers. . . .
Â
[5]
Misunderstanding of the dream . In the ages of crude primeval culture man believed that in dreams he got to know another real world ; here is the origin of all metaphysics. Without the dream one would have found no occasion for a division of the world. The separation of body and soul, too, is related to the most ancient conception of the dream; also the assumption of a quasibody of the soul, which is the origin of all belief in spirits and probably also of the belief in gods. âThe dead live on; for they appear to the living in dreamsâ; this inference went unchallenged for many thousands of years.
Â
[83]
The sleep of virtue . When virtue has slept, she will get up more refreshed.
Â
[113]
Christianity as antiquity . When we hear the ancient bells growling on a Sunday morning we ask ourselves: Is it really possible! this, for a Jew, crucified two thousand years ago, who said he was Godâs son. The proof of such a claim is lacking. Certainly the Christian religion is an antiquity projected into our times from remote prehistory; and the fact that the claim is believed âwhereas one is otherwise so strict in examining pretensionsâis perhaps the most ancient piece of this heritage. A god who begets children with a mortal woman; a sage who bids men work no more, have no more courts, but look for the signs of the impending end of the world; a justice that accepts the innocent as a vicarious sacrifice; someone who orders his disciples to drink his blood; prayers for miraculous interventions; sins perpetrated against a god, atoned for by a god; fear of a beyond to which death is the portal; the form of the cross as a symbol in a time that no longer knows the function and the ignominy of the crossâhow ghoulishly all this touches us, as if from the tomb of a primeval past! Can one believe that such things are still believed?
Â
[146]
The artistâs sense of truth . Regarding truths, the artist has a weaker morality than the thinker. He definitely does not want to be deprived of the splendid and profound interpretations of life, and he resists sober, simple methods and results. Apparently he fights for the higher dignity and significance of man; in truth, he does not want to give up the most effective presuppositions of his art: the fantastic, mythical, uncertain, extreme, the sense for the symbolic, the overestimation of the person, the faith in some miraculous element in the genius. Thus he considers the continued existence of his kind of creation more important than scientific devotion to the truth in every form, however plain.
Â
[170]
Artistsâ ambition. The Greek artists, for example, the tragedians, wrote in order to triumph. Their whole art is unthinkable without the contest: Hesiodâs good Eris, ambition, gave wings to their genius. Now this ambition demanded above all that their work attain the highest excellence in their own eyes, as they understood excellence, without consideration for any prevailing taste or public opinion concerning excellence in a work of art. Thus Aeschylus and Euripides remained unsuccessful for a long time, until they had finally educated judges of art who appraised their work by the standards they themselves applied. Thus they strove for a triumph over their rivals in their own estimation, before their own seat of judgment; they really wanted to be more excellent; and then they demanded outside agreement with their own estimation, a confirmation of their own judgment. Striving for honor here means âmaking oneself superior and also wishing to appear so publicly.â If the first is lacking and the second is desired nevertheless, then one speaks of vanity . If the second is lacking and is not missed, then one speaks of pride.
Â
[184]
Untranslatable . It is
Miranda James
Andrew Wood
Anna Maclean
Jennifer Jamelli
Red Garnier
Randolph Beck
Andromeda Bliss
Mark Schweizer
Jorge Luis Borges, Andrew Hurley
Lesley Young