Connollyâs remark about closing time in the gardens of the West.
Unless Burroughs is practising some complicated double irony (and I wouldnât put it past him), the West of Connollyâs usage has nothing to do with the Old West of Burroughâs obsession, site of his last novel,
The Place of Dead Roads
, which was second in the trilogy of which
Cities of the Red Night
was first and this the last. The âWestern Landsâ of Burroughsâ title are, mythologically speaking, where the dead live. That is, the place beyond death.
Essentially we are talking about immortality, the immortality promised by the poet to Mr W. H., which is no longer compatiblewith the weapons that cause âTotal Death. Soul Deathâ. âWell, thatâs what art is all about, isnât it? All creative thought, actually. A bid for immortality.â Who is talking about immortality? William Seward Hall, for one, old man and blocked writer, who decides to âwrite his way out of deathâ just as old novelists, like Scott, wrote themselves out of debt.
But, both in and out of this transparent disguise, Burroughs is talking about immortality, too.
The Western Lands
is structured according to an internal logic derived from an idiosyncratic reading of Egyptian myth; immortality, in its most concrete form, greatly concerned Egyptians.
In spite of a series of discontinuous story lines featuring a variety of heroes, the book often resembles a nineteenth-century commonplace book. The most urgent personal reflections are juxtaposed with jokes, satires, quotations, essays in fake anthropology, parody, pastiche, and passages of Burroughsâ unique infective delirium â piss, shit, offal, disembowellings. This is slapstick reinterpreted by Sade.
Cats of all kinds weave in and out of the text; Burroughs has clearly taken to them in a big way in his old age and seems torn between a fear they will betray him into sentimentality and a resigned acceptance that a man canât be ironic
all
the time.
The method is eclectic and discrete and it is important, and essential, because Burroughs is doing something peculiar with the readerâs time. Heâs stopping it. Or, rather, stop-starting it. Taking it out of the readerâs hands, anyway, which is where we tend to assume it ought to be.
Heâll give you a paragraph, a page, even three or four pages at a time, of narrative like a railway down which the reader, as if having boarded a train, travels from somewhere to somewhere else according to an already existing timetable. Then â the track vanishes. The train vanishes. And you find you donât have any clothes on, either. While all thatâs left of the engine driver is a .disappearing grin.
This constant derailment of the reader happens again and again, shattering the sense of cause and effect, whilst all the time one is reassured in the most affectingly disingenuous manner: âHow can any danger come from an old man cuddling his cats?â
You cannot hurry Burroughs, or skim, or read him for the story. He likes to take his time and to disrupt
your
time in sucha way that you cannot be carried along by this narrative. Each time it tips you out, you have to stand and think about it; you yourself are being rendered as discontinuous as the text.
In fact, Burroughsâ project is to make time stand still for a while, one which is more frequently that of religion than of literature and there are ways in which Burroughsâ work indeed resembles that of another William, the Blake of the self-crafted mythology of the Prophetic Books, although it must be said that Burroughs is much funnier.
He is also the only living American writer of whom one can say with confidence he will be read with the same shock of terror and pleasure in a hundred yearsâ time, or read at all, in fact, should there be anybody left to read.
(1988)
â¢Â   10   â¢
William Burroughs:
Ah Pook is