believes, the source of bitter and recurrent resentment toward the people who dreamed up these impossible demands. As I suggested, this can, even if itâs not intended to, devolve into a blame-the-victims argument.
Others say itâs because Jews have long chosen to be âa people apart,â with an unwillingess to assimilate or submerge their identity in modernityâs universalism. Others maintain it was the Jewsâ
invention
of modernity. The explanations multiply and contradict one another.
And perhapsâand this might sound at first like a radical suggestionâ
it
doesnât matter anymore
. The reasons, the origins, no longer matter. At this point anti-Semitism has become so embedded in history, or in sub-history, the subterranean history and mythology of hatred, that it will always be there, a template for whatever hurts need to find an easy answer, a simple-minded balm: the Jews are responsible. The explanation of renewed anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism: its ineradicable pre-existing historyâand its efficacy. It has become its own origin.
What is to be done? One answer was suggested by Leon Wieseltier at a conference he helped organize under the auspices of YIVO, the New Yorkâbased Jewish cultural institution, in May 2003. The conference was called âOld Demons, New Debates: Anti-Semitism in the West,â so apparently it was now no longer panicky to speak of such matters. And it brought together an impressive group of speakers.
In any case, although out of town at that time I was impressed by the tape I later heard of the opening address by Wieseltier. He said a number of very important things, I thought. Some had been said before by others, but he said them especially well.
One important thing he said is that those who consider that anti-Semitism is a problem only for Jews ought to reconsider: âIf anti-Semitism is to vanish from the earth it will be from the transformation of non-Jewish rather than Jewish [ peoples]. . . . In this sense it is not a Jewish problem at all . . . it is a prejudice whose object is not its cause . . . if you wish to study racism, study whites, not blacks.â But he also said that the struggle against anti-Semitism is âa requirement of self-interest and of dignityâ for Jews.
Iâm pleased to cede virtually the last word in this essay to the âEthnic Panicâ author, because it seemed to me he had learned much from the events of the year that followed his âEthnic Panicâ polemicâand perhaps from Ruth Wisseâs critique of it. 19
But I wouldnât say all non-Jews have abandoned that responsibility Leon Wieseltier spoke of, for anti-Semitism in our culture. I have been impressed by the seriousness with which some Christians and Muslims have addressed the question. Andrew Sullivanâs âAnti-Semitism Watchâ on his weblog has been invaluable in spotlighting shameful incidents. As has Glenn Reynoldsâs âInstaPunditâ website and Jeff Jarvisâs âbuzz-machine.â So have George Willâs columns and commentaries, and those of Stanley Crouch and Christopher Caldwell. Harold Evans and Oriana Fallaci were early and important voices. Iâm sure there are more Christians on the Left who have spoken out, even if for some reason none come instantly to mind. (Unless you count Christopher Hitchens, who, while half Jewishâand only half Leftist now according to the more rigid ideologuesâdeserves credit for popularizing a brilliantly compressed polemical coinage for Jew-hating Middle Eastern terrorists: âIslamo-fascists.â As in, isnât the Left supposed to
oppose
fascism?)
But to return to the question of optimism I first raised in regard to Amos Oz. I wish I could find an upbeat way of concluding this essay. As I write this draft, two Turkish synagogues and a Jewish school in France have just been bombed. The world is discussing whether the
Dawn Pendleton
Tom Piccirilli
Mark G Brewer
Iris Murdoch
Heather Blake
Jeanne Birdsall
Pat Tracy
Victoria Hamilton
Ahmet Zappa
Dean Koontz