sheâd had enough. She was asking herself, not for the first time, how it was possible to kiss a person you didnât really know; or rather, what that kiss exactly was .
Their talk turned, in dilatory fashion, to politics, the arts, subjects of the day, matters over which they had, if any, uninvolving influence: student misbehaviour, the cityâs rat population, disasters in China. They despatched several of these topics between them as Joe cooked, before Kit said, âWhat about your work? I mean, about your workâwhat is it exactly that you do? You didnât say.â
âDonât ask.â
He omitted to turn round this time, nor did he speak with emphasis, yet it was clear to her that he meant it: donât ask .
Perhaps heâs a vivisectionist, she thought.
âYou?â he said.
âOh,â Kit pulled a loopy, apologetic face, which, with his back turned, he didnât see, âwell, I hate to say it, but my work is fantastically interesting and I donât mind in the least being asked.â
âGo on then.â
âIââ How to begin? She blundered about in her mind trying to formulate the right first sentence. It wasnât as though she hadnât answered this question before.
âGive me a précis.â
âYou sure?â
He glanced round at her. âGive me a précis, woman.â
Kit said nothing.
âVery well, what discipline are you in, and what are you working on at the moment?â
She breathed in deep. âDPhil in English, nineteenth century. The past couple of weeks Iâve been tackling my introduction, which I rather bypassed at the start. Roughly speaking, Iâm looking at the use made in their work by some of the more substantial Victorian writers of real crimes, bearing in mind the complicating factor that, in their way of looking at it, you could legitimately draw distinctions between factual truth and, as they conceived it, higher moral truths; but also bearing in mind that, increasingly, from the 1830s onwards, writers were prepared to use quite recent real crimes in their novels, so that where they changed the details, their original readers couldnât avoid comparing the fictionalised result with a more accurate version they would remember from the newspapersâsomething we miss out on, reading these books now. Added to which, detectives were considered corrupt back then, yet they were seeking the truth, a little like these authors themselves, in a way. In fact, the first police detective unit in England, 1842, was a clandestine operationâthe government kept its existence secret from the public.â
âIt did?â
âFor fear of massive disapproval. Just for starters, people thought it was terribly wrong for detectives to be in plain clothes. This wasnât playing fair. It was deemed un-Christian, kind of thing.â Kit leant back in her chair and laid her hands down flat on the table. âWell, bore, bore,â she said.
âDonât go. Foodâs ready.â Joe put a plate on her place mat, remembered napkins, pepper, bowls for the salad.
âStart,â he said, cooking his own omelette.
âBlimey.â Kit tucked in, eating fast. It was the best meal sheâd had in ages as well as the smartest, and she was deeply hungry.
âSo. So youâre working on Victorian true-crime detective fiction, is that right?â
âAdmirably concise, yes; and n.b., police detectives only. This is delicious, by the way. Yes, and Iâm teaching for the first time. I have my first-ever pupil. You wonât believe this, but heâs called Orson.â
âOrson?â
âOrson McMurphy.â
âWhich college?â
âNone. Heâs in digs with some outfit called Milkweed Hall or whatever. No, Iâm kidding. But the small print of the thing is that heâs studying in Oxford, not at it, although considering all the people who teach
RS Anthony
W. D. Wilson
Pearl S. Buck
J.K. O'Hanlon
janet elizabeth henderson
Shawna Delacorte
Paul Watkins
Anne Marsh
Amelia Hutchins
Françoise Sagan