redshifted.
We can think of light as a collection of waves with different wavelengths corresponding to different energy states. Red light has a longer wavelength and lower energy state than blue light, at the other end of the spectrum. When we look at a star or galaxy, or any bright object, the light it emits is a mixture of these waves, some more energetic than others. What de Sitter found was that the light of any faraway object would be invariably pushed toward the red, appearing to have a longer wavelength and less energy than similar objects nearby. The farther away an object was, the redder it would be. A sure way to test de Sitterâs model would be to look for this phenomenon in the real universe.
The redshift effect, in which distant galaxies seemed to be more redshifted than closer ones, hinted that there was something not completely understood about de Sitterâs model. With Hermann Weyl, one of David Hilbertâs disciples from Göttingen, Eddington examined de Sitterâs solution more closely and found that if one sprinkled stars or galaxies all over spacetime, a very tight, linear relationship between the redshifts and distances of each star or galaxy emerged. An object that was twice as far from Earth as another would have a redshift that was correspondingly twice as large. This pattern of redshifting became known as the de Sitter effect.
When, in 1924, Lemaître took a closer look at de Sitterâs universe andEddington and Weylâs findings, he realized the equations in de Sitterâs paper were written in an odd way. De Sitter had formulated his theory using a static universe with a strange property: his universe had a center, and for an observer positioned at its center, there was a horizon beyond which nothing could be seen. This was at odds with one of Einsteinâs basic assumptions about the universe, that all places were equal. When Lemaître reformulated de Sitterâs universe so that the horizon went away and all points in space were considered equal, he found that the de Sitter universe behaved in a completely different way. Now, in Lemaîtreâs simpler way of looking at the universe, the curvature of space evolved with time and the geometry evolved as if points in space were hurtling away from each other. It was this evolution that could explain the de Sitter effect. Just like Friedmann a couple of years before, Lemaître had stumbled upon the evolving universe. Lemaîtreâs discovery that redshift was associated with an expanding universe had something that Friedmannâs earlier discovery did not: it could be tested with real-world observations.
Lemaître took his analysis a step further and looked for more solutions. To his surprise, he found that the static models that Einstein and de Sitter had been promoting were very special cases, almost aberrations of Einsteinâs theory of spacetime. While de Sitterâs model could be recast as an evolving universe, Einsteinâs model suffered from an instability that could rapidly kick it off-kilter. If, in Einsteinâs universe, there was even the smallest degree of imbalance between matter and the cosmological constant, the universe would rapidly start to expand or contract, rolling away from the placid state that Einstein so desired. In fact, as Lemaître found, Einsteinâs and de Sitterâs models were but two in a vast family of models, all of which expanded with time.
Â
The de Sitter effect had not gone unnoticed among astronomers. In fact, in 1915, even before de Sitter first proposed his model and its hallmark signature, an American astronomer,Vesto Slipher, had measured the redshifts of smudges of light, known as nebulae, scattered throughout the sky. He achieved this by measuring the spectra of these nebulae. The individual elements that make up a light-emitting object, be it a light bulb, a hot piece of coal, a star, or a nebula, emit a unique pattern of wavelengths of
Erik Scott de Bie
Clare Revell
Alice Munro
Dain White
C.A. Williams
Irenosen Okojie
Janette Oke
Julie Cross
Lauren Landish
Don Lee