first folder on the desk.
In the closet, I knew, was a small security box mounted to the wall. I walked over and opened it. I made up a pass codeâmy motherâs birthday, 2-27-61âand put the folders inside.
Keats said, Beauty is truth, truth beauty . What was the truth?
The folders knew.
One day, I would either drink and open the detector results, or I wouldnât.
Inside that second folder, there was either an interference pattern, or there wasnât. A yes or a no.
The answer was already printed.
*Â Â Â *Â Â Â *
I waited in Satvikâs office until he arrived in the morning. He put his briefcase on his desk, surprised to see me sitting in his swivel chair. He looked at me, at the clock, then back at me.
âWhat are you doing?â he asked.
âWaiting for you.â
âHow long have you been here?â
âSince four thirty a.m.â
He glanced around the room to see if Iâd changed anything. The same clutter of electrical equipment. To the rest of us, it was chaos, but Satvik probably had it memorized. I kicked back in his chair, fingers laced behind my head.
Satvik just watched me. Satvik was bright. He waited.
âCan you rig the detector to an indicator?â I asked him.
âWhat kind of indicator?â
âA light.â
âHow do you mean?â
âInstead of a readout, can you set up a light that goes off when the detector picks up an electron at the slit?â
His brow knitted. âIt shouldnât be hard. Why?â
âI thought before that there was nothing to prove with the two-slit experiment, but I might have been wrong.â
âWhat is left?â
I leaned forward. âLetâs define, exactly, the indeterminate system.â
Â
11
Later that morning, Point Machine watched the test. He stood in the near darkness of room 271. The machine thrummed. He studied the interference patternâthe narrow bands of phosphorescence.
âYouâre looking at one-half of the wave particle duality of light,â I said.
âWhatâs the other half look like?â
I turned the detectors on. The banded pattern diverged into two distinct clumps on the screen.
âThis.â
âOh,â Point Machine said. âIâve heard of this.â
*Â Â Â *Â Â Â *
Standing in Point Machineâs lab. Frogs swimming.
âTheyâre aware of light, right?â I asked.
âThey do have eyes.â
âBut, I mean, theyâre aware of it?â
âYeah, they respond to visual stimuli. Theyâre hunters. They have to see to hunt.â
I bent over the glass aquarium. âBut I mean, aware?â
*Â Â Â *Â Â Â *
âWhat did you do before here?â
âQuantum research.â
âMeaning what?â Point Machine asked.
I tried to shrug him off. âThere were a range of projects. Solid-state photonic devices, Fourier transforms, liquid NMR.â
âFourier transforms?â
âComplex equations that can be used to translate waveforms into visual elements.â
Point Machine looked at me, dark eyes tightening. He said again, very slowly, enunciating each word, âWhat did you do, exactly ?â
âComputers,â I said. âWe were working with computers. Quantum encryption processing extending up to sixteen qubits. I had a partner with a whole team under us, working at a start-up right out of college. It was all applied theory stuff. I was the theory part.â
âAnd the applied part?â
âThat was my friend Stuart. He was interested in dynamics-based modeling solutions. Packing more polygons into the isosurface meshwork of 3D renders.â
âSo what happened?â
âWe pushed model fidelity by an order of magnitude but eventually came up against the computational constraints of the system. Near the end, we used the Fourier transforms to remodel the wave information into
David Housewright
K. J. Taylor
Tilly Tennant
Cheyanne Young
Rie Warren
Lynn Lake
Dawn Farnham
David Wiltse
James M. Cain
Marie Ferrarella