not always, reeking of immoral xenophobia. This kind of black leadership is not only symptomatic of black alienation and desperation in a country more and more indifferent or hostile to the quality of life among black working and poor people; it also reinforces the fragmentation of U.S. progressive efforts that could reverse this deplorable plight. In this way, black nationalist leaders often inadvertently contribute to the very impasse they are trying to overcome: inadequate social attention and action to change the plight of Americaâs âinvisible people,â especially disadvantaged black people.
Third, this crisis of black leadership contributes to political cynicism among black people; it encourages the idea that we cannot really make a difference in changing our society. This cynicismâalready promoted by the larger political cultureâdampens the fire of engaged local activists who have made a difference. These activists are engaged in protracted grassroots organization in principled coalitions that bring power and pressure to bear on specific issues. And they are people who have little interest in being in the national limelight, such as the Industrial Areas Foundation efforts of BUILD in Baltimore or Harlem initiatives in Manhattan.
Without such activists there can be no progressive politics. Yet state, regional, and national networks are also required for an effective progressive politics. That is why locally based collective (and especially multigendered) models of black leadership are needed. These models must shun the idea of one black national leader; they also should put a premium on critical dialogue and democratic accountability in black organizations.
T HE crisis in black leadership can be remedied only if we candidly confront its existence. We need national forums to reflect, discuss, and plan how best to respond. It is neither a matter of a new Messiah figure emerging, nor of another organization appearing on the scene. Rather, it is a matter of grasping the structural and institutional processes that have disfigured, deformed, and devastated black America such that the resources for nurturing collective and critical consciousness, moral commitment, and courageous engagement are vastly underdeveloped. We need serious strategic and tactical thinking about how to create new models of leadership and forge the kind of persons to actualize these models. These models must not only question our silent assumptions about black leadershipâsuch as the notion that black leaders are always middle classâbut must also force us to interrogate iconic figures of the past. This includes questioning Kingâs sexism and homophobia and the relatively undemocratic character of his organization, and examining Malcolmâs silence on the vicious role of priestly versions of Islam in the modern world.
But one point is beyond dispute: The time is past for black political and intellectual leaders to pose as the voice for black America. Gone are the days when black political leaders jockey for the label âpresident of black America,â or when black intellectuals pose as the âwriters of black America.â The days of brokering for the black turfâof posing as the Head Negro in Charge (H.N.I.C.)âare over. To be a serious black leader is to be a race-transcending prophet who critiques the powers that be (including the black component of the Establishment) and who puts forward a vision of moral regeneration and political insurgency for the purpose of fundamental social change for all who suffer from socially induced misery. For the moment, we reflect and regroup with a vow that the 1990s will make the 1960s look like a tea party.
Chapter Four
Demystifying the New Black Conservatism
Â
It is, indeed, one of the basic moral blindspots of American conservatism that its intellectual and leadership energy have never been focussed in a proactive way on Americaâs racial-caste
Darby Karchut
R. L. Stine
Day Keene
James Suriano
Chris Thompson
Mark Batterson
John Sandford
James Glaeg
Willow Rose
Priscilla Royal