threaten to overwhelm him, not least of which is mortality.
In short, power is, paradoxically, the primordial marshland of fear, from which emerges the precipitate of manâs neurotic response to mortality. Therein he proceeds to attempt to match himself with the force of Nature, that agency through which the various apprehensions of God, Super Being, or whatever nameâ including Deathâare filtered. You cannot, however, contain within yourself the elemental force of death, godhead, a thunderstorm, an earthquake, or a volcano, never mind the comparison of some energetic types to a whirlwind. Those who take such metaphors personally are subject matter for traditional psychiatry, and it is for this reason that ancient societies devised a number of ritualized scenarios for the banalization of power. As a dramatist, I have myself experimented with a number of rituals toward that end. Here is oneâdesigned, however, only for the formal, not the shadowy counterpart of manifest power. It takes off from the French play-wright and exorcist Jean Genet.
A glitzy brothel, most appropriately, is the setting for Jean Genetâs ritualization of the insatiable collaboratorâpowerâin his play
The Balcony.
There, the power-obsessed come periodically to act out their fantasies. Here now is a summary of my variation on Jean Genet:
Suppose we modernized Genetâs rather primitive stage mechanics to embrace the very latest in special effects, Ã la Steven Spielberg. Society would proceed to offer its ruler a chance to erupt with the earthquake, soar on flues of the thunderstorm, and become virtually one with the convulsion that attends the birth of new planets. Encased in a Virtual Reality capsule, a super Jacuzzi, the Maximum Leader would dominate the universe every day before breakfast. As a finaleâand here I must acknowledge the inspiration of the innovation of that late leader Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaire, who soared with the sunrise and disappeared into the clouds every morning on his nationâs televisionâthe Leader would watch the daily waste of his bodily functions morph into a celestial orbâthe sun, no lessârising over the horizon, approving the beginning of a new day for his people.
After such an immersion in the utter sublimity of galactic power, any mortal must emerge with nothing but contempt for the mere pittance of awe and terror that are the normal dues from his miserable subjects. He would leave themâusâto wallow in our now unappealing state of . . . unbroken freedom, and the absence of fear.
I am persuaded that this is a ritualistic offering that no man-eating dictator, with the innate theatrics of that breed, could ever refuse.
Three
Rhetoric That Binds and Blinds
I propose to address this topic from two directionsâ one, the political; the other, the religious. Given the fact that, in the present dayâand indeed, in a nearly unbroken continuum of historyâboth often prove to be merely two sides of the same coin, it should not be surprising if, from time to time, it would indeed appear that all we are engaged upon is tossing up, just like a coin, one two-sided notion. We watch it spin through the air in a blur of rapid alternations, and succumb to the law of gravityâknown as coming down to earthâto reveal one side or the other, almost interchangeably. The sanctimoniousness that often characterizes oneâ the politicalâon the one hand, and the sacrosanctity that is claimed as the foundation of the other, even when it extends its constituency to the political and the mundane, make it clear that they are both claimants to the same highway of influence and control of human lives whose ultimate destination is powerâthe consolidation of power in itself, or the execution of policies that aspire to the total control of a polity.
Thus, the president of a powerful nation addresses a political situation in what amounts to the language
Sarah Woodbury
June Ahern
John Wilson
Steven R. Schirripa
Anne Rainey
L. Alison Heller
M. Sembera
Sydney Addae
S. M. Lynn
Janet Woods