first.â
âWhy?â
âEarly reports in popular newspapers are very misleading.â
âThe reports in the posh papers convey pretty much thesame information in a different way. The Telegraph has always been very hot on sensational casesâmurder, sex, or whatever. And particularly combinations of the two, as here.â
âYou hadnât got to the third category, you say, Colin?â
âNot yet.â
âA bit more came out later on, about the nanny. She was Australian, by the way.â
âYesâone paper picked that up in the piles I have read.â
âA graduateâSydney University. She and the Revills went around to plays, opera, and so on.â
âWas that in the early days, before Lord John seduced her, or vice versa?â
âWhat an old-fashioned word! You have no evidence who seduced who, or if anything that could be called a seduction took place. It was probably mutual attraction and shared enthusiasm. I donât think it was only before the affair began. Thereâs mention in one of the gossip columns of their having been seen at Turandot, and Chips with Everything and Allâs Well as a threesome. That was in the month leading up to the murder.â
âCould still be before the affair began, or before it was found out by the wife. . . . Presumably someone baby-sat the children.â
âWhat do you mean? Someone who could have known or got to know what was going on? It could be the housekeeper. Sheâs another shadowy figure.â
âYes, she is,â I agreed. âSo, with the nanny, it wasnât just a matter of having a typical upper-class servant. The formidable dragon, passed on from one aristocratic family to another. It was more in the nature of an au-pair arrangement, with her doing the cultural sights in return for housework and child-minding.â
âThatâs right. Lucy Mariotti was her nameâchristened, presumably Lucia. English graduate, but no English relatives to gethospitality from when she came over to do the cultural scene. There was a big Italian migration to Australia just after the war. In fact the Mafia took over a lot of the markets and raised the crime profile no end. Not that thatâs relevant in this case. As far as the reports went there was nothing to suggest that her background was anything other than respectable.â
âDid the Revills advertise for a nanny in Australia?â
âNo, in The Times. She was already over here, and replied.â
âWell, that starts filling in the picture . . .â I cast my mind back, lighting up a cigarette to Susanâs predictable annoyance. I went over and puffed smoke out of the open window. âWhat were you looking so pleased about when you came back?â
She smiled her slow smile.
âIâd been lunching with someone whoâs doing a thesis on the color supplements.â
Oddly enough I felt a sudden spurt of joy: she hadnât been lunching with a boyfriend. Oddly, and stupidly, tooâbecause she could have been doing that on any or every of the four hundred or so days since we had split up. I tried to keep my voice low and natural when I spoke, though I guessed she had observed my reaction. Susan was a first-rate observer.
âWhat a very silly thing to do a thesis on.â
âNot at all. The color supplements have molded middleclass tastes in the last thirty or forty years. They say you ought to want it, and in no time at all you do. They also contain articles of general interest . . .â
âSuch as the Revill affair.â
âSuch as indeed. My informant came up with three, all in the last twenty years.â
ââWhere are they now?â stuff?â
âTo some extent. Pictures of the children grown up, but never anything more than that. Caroline and Matthew their names are.Theyâve never cooperated with any of the muckrakers, or any of
James Holland
Scott Caladon
Cassie Alexandra, K.L. Middleton
Sophia Henry
Bianca D'Arc
Ha Jin
Griff Hosker
Sarah Biglow
Andersen Prunty
Glen Cook